CRAZYMONK
10-30 11:11 AM
Check whether Hialeah Florida is your employer Jurisdiction.
If so it might have transferred for background verification.
If so it might have transferred for background verification.
wallpaper selena gomez who says
Dhundhun
10-28 01:35 AM
Good finding. They should push quarterly overflow to keep them busy.
redgreen
10-14 01:47 PM
It is mentioned by many that PD should be current at the time of GC approval. Is that right?
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
2011 makeup selena gomez 2011 who
sundarpn
10-01 12:09 PM
it is increasing to 1225 I think in Nov sometime. Not this month. My attorney said $1000 yesterday, so that's what I am paying.
more...
jkamel5
06-06 02:49 AM
Hi,
I just got my H1B visa and I am working. My wife is currently on F-1/OPT. We are both in the USA. Could you please advise me what is the required documents/steps to apply for her for H4 visa? are there any inf on the web? can I do that myself?
Thank you,
John
I just got my H1B visa and I am working. My wife is currently on F-1/OPT. We are both in the USA. Could you please advise me what is the required documents/steps to apply for her for H4 visa? are there any inf on the web? can I do that myself?
Thank you,
John
lecter
December 23rd, 2003, 09:01 AM
imagine, if MF digital backs were say, $6999, how many would sell???
bloody thousands....
seems stupid to me to make them so expensive
bloody thousands....
seems stupid to me to make them so expensive
more...
lucas92
05-04 07:04 PM
it appears like a farm and a tree. I think it is cool
2010 selena gomez who says music
GIDOC
05-30 10:15 PM
It is difficult to predict the timeline.
The house members are not happy with the Senate bill.
I have read that the conference committee may meet next monday ( all hearsay).
We can only pray and hope for the best.
The house members are not happy with the Senate bill.
I have read that the conference committee may meet next monday ( all hearsay).
We can only pray and hope for the best.
more...
Blog Feeds
10-15 06:30 PM
Foreign nationals who have stayed in the United States after the expiration of their period of authorized stay or are present in the United States without being admitted or paroled are unlawfully present in the U.S.
If more than 180 days but less than a year of unlawful presence accrues, then the foreign national is inadmissible for three years (three year bar). Foreign nationals who are unlawfully present for one year or more are inadmissible for 10 years (10 year bar). If a foreign national has accrued unlawful presence in the United States, then they are deemed inadmissible and illegible to re-enter the U.S. for either the three year or 10 year bar from the date they leave the U.S.
There is a waiver available for the unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility. Essentially the waiver will waive the three and 10 year bar of inadmissibility. The waiver is only available to foreign nationals with a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouse or parent. Children are not deemed qualifying relatives for the waiver. The first step in the waiver process is for the foreign national to attend an immigrant visa consular interview in their home country. Once the consular officer deems the foreign national is inadmissible and a waiver is available, the foreign national will then file the waiver (form I-601, with the applicable filing fee) and establish there is extreme hardship to the U.S. citizen or LPR spouse or parent if the foreign national were not allowed to return to the United States. The waiver request is discretionary and extreme hardship is only one factor the officer will consider.
Certain individuals do not accrue unlawful presence and are not subject to the three or 10 year bar. For instance, foreign nationals under 18 years of age do not accrue unlawful presence.
For more information on the waiver process, and extreme hardship, please call Kraft & Associates at 214-999-9999.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/4VwzqcGxyMc/)
If more than 180 days but less than a year of unlawful presence accrues, then the foreign national is inadmissible for three years (three year bar). Foreign nationals who are unlawfully present for one year or more are inadmissible for 10 years (10 year bar). If a foreign national has accrued unlawful presence in the United States, then they are deemed inadmissible and illegible to re-enter the U.S. for either the three year or 10 year bar from the date they leave the U.S.
There is a waiver available for the unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility. Essentially the waiver will waive the three and 10 year bar of inadmissibility. The waiver is only available to foreign nationals with a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouse or parent. Children are not deemed qualifying relatives for the waiver. The first step in the waiver process is for the foreign national to attend an immigrant visa consular interview in their home country. Once the consular officer deems the foreign national is inadmissible and a waiver is available, the foreign national will then file the waiver (form I-601, with the applicable filing fee) and establish there is extreme hardship to the U.S. citizen or LPR spouse or parent if the foreign national were not allowed to return to the United States. The waiver request is discretionary and extreme hardship is only one factor the officer will consider.
Certain individuals do not accrue unlawful presence and are not subject to the three or 10 year bar. For instance, foreign nationals under 18 years of age do not accrue unlawful presence.
For more information on the waiver process, and extreme hardship, please call Kraft & Associates at 214-999-9999.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/4VwzqcGxyMc/)
hair selena gomez who says cover
jest_1
03-07 08:29 AM
Amitga,
Iam in a similar situation as Ihitha. Iam planning to go to Chennai in June for stamping. Which answer do you think would be a convincing one for that question asked by the VO ?
Also after changing from L1 to H1, i had my H1 transferred between 3 companies (i changed jobs within a span of 1 month), and the current employer iam working for, iam working for about 1 year and 3 months. When i go for stamping, would they be asking for paystubs from those two companies, or does it matter only with the latest company iam working for ?
It wouldd be great if someone can help me with some suggestions.
Iam in a similar situation as Ihitha. Iam planning to go to Chennai in June for stamping. Which answer do you think would be a convincing one for that question asked by the VO ?
Also after changing from L1 to H1, i had my H1 transferred between 3 companies (i changed jobs within a span of 1 month), and the current employer iam working for, iam working for about 1 year and 3 months. When i go for stamping, would they be asking for paystubs from those two companies, or does it matter only with the latest company iam working for ?
It wouldd be great if someone can help me with some suggestions.
more...
pillagandhi
04-28 10:19 AM
Update
went from initial review to acceptance at california
4/11-Received vermont
4/25 - initial review - transferred to california
4/27 - Acceptance !!! and they do not tell us if this is premium processing or not
went from initial review to acceptance at california
4/11-Received vermont
4/25 - initial review - transferred to california
4/27 - Acceptance !!! and they do not tell us if this is premium processing or not
hot 2011 selena gomez makeup who
tnite
10-08 11:17 AM
In our 485 notices, Under the section, it is stated as Unknown. priority date is blank. Please let me know if anyone is facing similar situation and what needs to be done to correct it?
Please give some input
Thanks
I had the same issue.If it makes you feel better call USCIS and put in a service request.They will get back to you in 30 days.
Please give some input
Thanks
I had the same issue.If it makes you feel better call USCIS and put in a service request.They will get back to you in 30 days.
more...
house selena gomez who says
GCHope2011
10-20 06:12 AM
Get it Notarized with photo and send the document.There are standard formats available.
If it is Power of Attorney to deal in property matters on your behalf, then the notarized copy also needs to be stamped by the Indian Consulate in your area.
So there is one more loop involved - to get it endorsed by Indian Consulate, after you have done the notarization. I believe this is something that has become applicable recently as I had to do it last month. A few years ago when I had done the first one, it was just preparing the POA document, and getting it notarized.
If it is Power of Attorney to deal in property matters on your behalf, then the notarized copy also needs to be stamped by the Indian Consulate in your area.
So there is one more loop involved - to get it endorsed by Indian Consulate, after you have done the notarization. I believe this is something that has become applicable recently as I had to do it last month. A few years ago when I had done the first one, it was just preparing the POA document, and getting it notarized.
tattoo Selena Gomez amp; The Scene – Who
purgan
05-08 07:32 PM
I dont' feel there is anything wrong with posting it...after all he has not written it (and even if he did, there is such a thing called freedom of speech)...he has only posted it.
more...
pictures selena gomez who says cover
logus
10-13 09:52 PM
Hi all,
I am in the middle of H1-B transfer from Comp A to Comp B.. I have an urgent question,
Company A didn't run my payroll from 11/26/07-4/11/08 because i was out of the project,since then i have had a consistent payroll no gaps, my question is
1.will that affect my H1-b transfer?
2.will USCIS go back that far to verify my paystubs?, and
Please Please Please reply , if possible any attorneys
Thanks in Advance
Anuj
I am in the middle of H1-B transfer from Comp A to Comp B.. I have an urgent question,
Company A didn't run my payroll from 11/26/07-4/11/08 because i was out of the project,since then i have had a consistent payroll no gaps, my question is
1.will that affect my H1-b transfer?
2.will USCIS go back that far to verify my paystubs?, and
Please Please Please reply , if possible any attorneys
Thanks in Advance
Anuj
dresses 2011 selena gomez who says
mamit
03-07 11:31 AM
I thought about putting up a new thread since we don't have a specific post for people who went through (or are currently going through) the "security clearance" and the typical delay that it entails.
Thanks for your co-operation.
Thanks for your co-operation.
more...
makeup Scene-who says youre notmar
Sandeep
02-27 06:31 PM
Dear Faxer: Phone your Senator on Judiciary Comm to oppose his amnesty for 10 million illegal aliens
This new Phone Call Request has been posted in your Action Buffet !
You can find this Phone Call Request by proceeding to
http://www.numbersusa.com/phones?XXXXXX
Your phone call to your U.S. Senator on the Judiciary Committee this week can help stop a massive illegal-alien amnesty
Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has just introduced an immigration bill that would reward virtually all of the 10.2 million illegal aliens estimated to be in the United States as of January 1, 2004.
Sen. Specter's immigration bill would reward these more than 10 million illegal aliens with exactly what they broke U.S. law to obtain: permission to work in the United States indefinitely. A significant number of the estimated 1.2 million illegal aliens who have entered the United States since Jan. 1, 2004, along with some of those who enter in the future, also would likely be able to obtain amnesty through fraud. (Experts have found that the fraud rate in the 1986 amnesty was as high as 70 percent.)
Read a chart comparing Sen. Specter's immigration proposal with the House-passed H.R. 4437 by clicking here.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider Sen. Specter's immigration proposal on Thursday, March 2nd. Phone your Senator on the Judiciary Committee BEFORE Thursday. Ask them to oppose the Specter amnesty.
Do you want more or less information?As a NumbersUSA subscriber, you will receive occasional emails about immigration-related opportunities. If you want to increase or reduce the frequency of these emails, click here and choose from Total Activism, Moderate Activism, or Limited Activism at the bottom of your registration form: http://www.numbersusa.com/user
NumbersUSA - relies upon individuals like you to reach its goal of an environmentally sustainable and economically just America.
This new Phone Call Request has been posted in your Action Buffet !
You can find this Phone Call Request by proceeding to
http://www.numbersusa.com/phones?XXXXXX
Your phone call to your U.S. Senator on the Judiciary Committee this week can help stop a massive illegal-alien amnesty
Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has just introduced an immigration bill that would reward virtually all of the 10.2 million illegal aliens estimated to be in the United States as of January 1, 2004.
Sen. Specter's immigration bill would reward these more than 10 million illegal aliens with exactly what they broke U.S. law to obtain: permission to work in the United States indefinitely. A significant number of the estimated 1.2 million illegal aliens who have entered the United States since Jan. 1, 2004, along with some of those who enter in the future, also would likely be able to obtain amnesty through fraud. (Experts have found that the fraud rate in the 1986 amnesty was as high as 70 percent.)
Read a chart comparing Sen. Specter's immigration proposal with the House-passed H.R. 4437 by clicking here.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider Sen. Specter's immigration proposal on Thursday, March 2nd. Phone your Senator on the Judiciary Committee BEFORE Thursday. Ask them to oppose the Specter amnesty.
Do you want more or less information?As a NumbersUSA subscriber, you will receive occasional emails about immigration-related opportunities. If you want to increase or reduce the frequency of these emails, click here and choose from Total Activism, Moderate Activism, or Limited Activism at the bottom of your registration form: http://www.numbersusa.com/user
NumbersUSA - relies upon individuals like you to reach its goal of an environmentally sustainable and economically just America.
girlfriend selena gomez who says music
mixednut
02-21 02:33 PM
It appears that US CIS lost my I-90 application a year ago and subsequent attempts to get a replacement GC failed thus far. Best course of action?
Here are the details...
Received GC in 1999. Last year when I tried to get a re-entry permit (I-131), US CIS mailed me a notice saying that my GC had the wrong A-number on it (US CIS administrative error), and needed to be replaced via I-90.
The notice also said that while waiting for the replacement GC, I could go to the district office, obtain a temporary GC, and then re-file for I-131.
So in January 2007, I filed the no-cost I-90, where the reason was, "My card was issued with incorrect information because of a USCIS administrative error. I have attached the incorrect card and evidence of the correct information." The application included the original GC with the "bad" A-number, and was sent via certified mail, receipt requested. Later, I received a confirmation from US Mail that the application was delivered.
Subsequent multiple requests to US CIS produced the response, "We have no record of your application". Subsequently mailed copied of the I-90 application, produced a response, "denied, your did not include a GC with your application".
I did another "Service Request" with US CIS yesterday, and am pretty sure the response will be the same, "We have no record of your application".
What would you suggest as the best course of action? Just file a full cost (about $300?) I-90 declaring the GC "lost", and forget that it was the US CIS error?
Thanks for any help!
Here are the details...
Received GC in 1999. Last year when I tried to get a re-entry permit (I-131), US CIS mailed me a notice saying that my GC had the wrong A-number on it (US CIS administrative error), and needed to be replaced via I-90.
The notice also said that while waiting for the replacement GC, I could go to the district office, obtain a temporary GC, and then re-file for I-131.
So in January 2007, I filed the no-cost I-90, where the reason was, "My card was issued with incorrect information because of a USCIS administrative error. I have attached the incorrect card and evidence of the correct information." The application included the original GC with the "bad" A-number, and was sent via certified mail, receipt requested. Later, I received a confirmation from US Mail that the application was delivered.
Subsequent multiple requests to US CIS produced the response, "We have no record of your application". Subsequently mailed copied of the I-90 application, produced a response, "denied, your did not include a GC with your application".
I did another "Service Request" with US CIS yesterday, and am pretty sure the response will be the same, "We have no record of your application".
What would you suggest as the best course of action? Just file a full cost (about $300?) I-90 declaring the GC "lost", and forget that it was the US CIS error?
Thanks for any help!
hairstyles selena gomez who says. selena
Marphad
01-06 01:59 PM
Change.org (http://www.change.org/ideas/browse) (pick Immigration in the browse by cause box on the right side of the screen) is now actively voting on various ideas.
There are 3 ideas there, but none for our cause.
I am no pro on these, but may be we could get an idea inserted for our cause and get enough votes on it.
Thanks for posting this.
There are 3 ideas there, but none for our cause.
I am no pro on these, but may be we could get an idea inserted for our cause and get enough votes on it.
Thanks for posting this.
venangara
10-01 09:43 PM
You need to have PT license to work. Every state has different rules, there is lot of paper work involved to sit for license exam. For Indians, mostly it was easy for Michigan, New york. For present scenario better check physicaltherapyforum.com, very good info avaliable
Once you pass license it is easy to get job and H1, presently physical therapy is recession proof. well paid over 60-75000 for new grads.
Once you pass license it is easy to get job and H1, presently physical therapy is recession proof. well paid over 60-75000 for new grads.
lecter
May 24th, 2004, 09:21 AM
nice job!!
No comments:
Post a Comment